BREAKING: Asari Dokubo Laments 24 Years of Igbo Leadership in Rivers, Says Wike Is ‘Tormenting’ Them
Asari Dokubo, a former Niger Delta militant leader, has criticized former Rivers State Governor Nyesom Wike, accusing him of undermining the current administration of Governor Siminalayi Fubara. Dokubo made these remarks while addressing the ongoing political crisis in Rivers State, which has seen tensions between Wike, now the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, and his successor, Fubara.
Dokubo claimed that the Igbos had governed Rivers State for 24 years since its creation, and now that an Ijaw person is in power, Wike is allegedly making efforts to destabilize the government. He expressed frustration over what he sees as Wike’s interference in the affairs of the state, arguing that the Ijaw people, who have long been part of the state’s political landscape, deserve the opportunity to govern without external pressure.
The political rift between Wike and Fubara has been ongoing for months, with tensions escalating over control of the state’s political structure. Despite being instrumental in Fubara’s election, Wike has been accused of attempting to exert undue influence over the governor’s administration. This has led to divisions within the state’s political leadership, with some lawmakers and officials aligning themselves with either Wike or Fubara.
Dokubo, known for his strong pro-Ijaw stance, emphasized that the Ijaw people have historically played a significant role in the development of Rivers State but have not had substantial opportunities to lead. He accused Wike of trying to suppress Ijaw leadership, stating that his actions are aimed at weakening Fubara’s government. He further argued that Wike’s alleged interference is part of a broader strategy to maintain control over the state’s affairs even after leaving office.
The crisis in Rivers State has drawn national attention, with various political figures and stakeholders calling for a resolution. President Bola Tinubu has intervened in the matter, seeking to mediate between the two factions. However, tensions remain high, as both sides continue to assert their influence over the state’s political and administrative structures.
Supporters of Wike argue that his involvement is necessary to ensure stability and continuity in governance, given his experience and political strength. On the other hand, Fubara’s supporters insist that he should be allowed to govern independently without external pressure. The struggle has resulted in legal battles, disputes over appointments, and even a conflict within the state’s House of Assembly.
Dokubo’s comments reflect the broader ethnic and political dynamics at play in Rivers State, where different groups have vied for political dominance over the years. His remarks suggest that the crisis is not just about governance but also about representation and historical grievances.
As the situation unfolds, political analysts warn that prolonged instability could impact governance and development in the state. Calls for dialogue and reconciliation continue, but with both factions holding firm to their positions, a lasting resolution remains uncertain.
