Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has fired back at the Nigerian presidency over its response to his criticism of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s economic policies.
Recall that Atiku on Sunday described the current administration’s approach as “trial-and-error” and accused the government of running a “palliative economy,” arguing that implementing multiple reforms simultaneously would be “overkill.”
Atiku had maintained that his administration would have adopted a gradual approach to subsidy removal, citing examples from Malaysia and Indonesia.
The presidency quickly reacted, insisting that Atiku’s ideas lacked detail and were rejected by Nigerians in the 2023 polls.
The Special Adviser to President Tinubu on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, on Sunday also warned that an Atiku-led administration would have plunged Nigeria into a worse situation or resulted in cronyism.
The Special Adviser to the President on Social Media, Dada Olusegun, further dismissed Atiku’s criticism.
He said, “You weren’t elected, Alhaji. You can’t even unite your party with only 13 governors. You can’t provide proper leadership to be considered a serious opposition.”
Atiku is a member of the main opposition Peoples Democratic Party, PDP.
The PDP is facing a crisis at the national level, which many commentators attribute to the fallout between Atiku and former Rivers State Governor Nyesom Wike. The tension arose after the party’s primary, where Atiku emerged as the presidential candidate for the 2023 election.
In a statement on Monday, Atiku replied to the responses from the presidency.
He said, “I have taken note of the initial responses highlighting the striking disparity between President Tinubu’s faltering economic policies and the alternatives I have proposed.”
He said that his team devised a comprehensive Recovery Plan, welcoming input from Nigerians.
Atiku also criticized the presidency’s reliance on prayer, saying, “Prayer indeed serves as a noble path to follow, but the sacred texts also counsel us to engage in diligent labour and hard work.” He pointed out that under his economic stewardship between 1999-2003, Nigeria rose to the pinnacle of Africa’s economies.
Commenting on the 2023 election where he lost to Tinubu, according to the results announced by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Atiku said, “Let me emphasize that the citizens who cast their votes in the 2023 presidential election are well aware that I did not lose; rather, we find ourselves in this predicament because the election was criminally stolen from the Nigerian people.”
The statement posted on his official X handle reads in full:
I have taken note of the initial responses highlighting the striking disparity between President Tinubu’s faltering economic policies and the alternatives I have proposed. It is exciting to witness such a vigorous debate on these critical matters, and I sincerely hope that this discourse will ultimately benefit Nigeria and its citizens.
Like many fellow Nigerians, I firmly believe that we find ourselves in this current economic turmoil due to the Tinubu administration’s hasty ascent to power, devoid of a coherent plan.
In stark contrast, my team not only devised a comprehensive Recovery Plan but also welcomed significant input from Nigerians, ensuring that our approach was inclusive and well-considered.
Isn’t it fascinating how the so-called “tested” Tinubu administration’s only policy response seems to be a national prayer led by the First Lady and the NSA? Just a mere 24 hours after I proposed my alternative solutions! What a bold strategy! 🤣
In my humble interpretation of the scriptures, prayer indeed serves as a noble path to follow. However, the sacred texts also counsel us to engage in diligent labour and hard work.
It is therefore uncharitable for Tinubu’s team to claim that my proposals remain untested. What remains unproven is the erratic, trial-and-error nature of the policies so far implemented by this administration, which elucidates our present predicament.
Let us not forget that under our economic stewardship between 1999-2003, Nigeria soared to the pinnacle of Africa’s economies, while their administration has relegated us to a disheartening fourth position.
The average GDP rate under the Obasanjo administration that I served in was 6.59% and peaked at 15% in 2002; 7.98% under the late Yar’Adua administration and 4.8% under Jonathan compared to the dismal 2.8% of the so-called “tested” Tinubu era. Enough of the pains of the shambolic “bolekaja” economic policy prescriptions!
We cannot hope to tax our way out of the economic quagmire wrought by these misguided experimental policies of a novice administration. Numerous nations, such as the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Monaco (an EU territory with a zero-income tax policy), among many others, have emerged as economic powerhouses by fostering growth through lower taxation. Why then are we fixated on inflicting further hardship upon an already struggling populace?
One can only speculate that Tinubu’s government is anchored to a mere Tea-plan, which can only lead to a T-pain.
Furthermore, let me emphasize that the citizens who cast their votes in the 2023 presidential election are well aware that I did not lose; rather, we find ourselves in this predicament because the election was criminally stolen from the Nigerian people.
