We Serve The Best News Around The Globe

Sheikh Gumi Defends Talks With Bandits, Says He Facilitated Surrender of 600 Militants

Popular Islamic cleric Sheikh Gumi has strongly rejected calls for his arrest, saying his peace-building role in Nigeria’s security crisis is being unfairly politicised.

He argues that his role as a mediator with bandit gangs is patriotic, not criminal.

In a statement on Sunday, the cleric lashed out at critics who demand he be detained.

He described them as “spineless, irresponsible and unpatriotic imbecilic people” who prefer sensationalism over real solutions.

Gumi reminded Nigerians of a major intervention he led in January 2021 in Sabon Garin Yadi forest, Kaduna State.

He says he was accompanied by the then Kaduna State Commissioner of Police — representing the Inspector-General — when he met with over 600 armed bandits and their commanders.

According to him, the meeting was part of a peace process.

The bandits agreed to disarm in exchange for security guarantees and basic amenities. But, he claims, the government never delivered on its side of the bargain.

He insisted that his mediation was legitimate, transparent, and done with full knowledge of the authorities. He faults the government, not him, for the collapse of the agreement.

Gumi expressed frustration that his critics are targeting him personally rather than asking why the state failed to provide the promises it made.

He said he only asked for the conditions the bandits set — protection, development and a voice — to be honored.

The Muslim cleric also defended his right to speak freely. “Is free speech no longer part of our constitutional right?” he asked, accusing his opponents of intolerance for different viewpoints.

He warned that shutting down voices that advocate for dialogue will only worsen Nigeria’s insecurity.

According to him, hate-driven narratives undermine genuine efforts to address root causes of violence.

He closed with a prayer: “May Allah protect our nation from bigotry, stubborn and complete intolerance of contrary views and opinions.”