Promote Your Music Here On Whatsapp Only: +2348051168989
The Incorporated Trustees of the Civil Society Observatory for Constitutional and Legal Compliance (CSOCLC) has again reignited the controversy on whether President Muhammadu Buhari has attained the minimum educational qualification to enable him seek re-election into the office of the president.
In a suit filed at the Federal High Court in Abuja, the Independent National Electoral Commission, the All Progressives Congress and President Muhammadu Buhari are listed as 1st, 2nd and 3rd defendants respectively.
All the defendants have been served and the suit has been assigned to Justice Binta Nyako who has fixed hearing on an application for accelerated hearing filed alongside the originating summons for the 4th of February, 2019.
The plaintiff is also asking for an injunction restraining Buhari from contesting the presidential election.
Among others, the plaintiff asked the court for an order disqualifying and barring the 3rd Defendant President Muhammadu Buhari, GCFR from standing for and contesting election to the office of President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria at the 2019 General Elections for making a false statement to INEC in breach of the provisions of Section 31 (6) of the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended) and failure to attach proof to his Affidavit in support of Personal Particulars (INEC Form C.F. 001) that he has attained educational qualifications to qualify to contest election to the office of President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as set out in Section 131 (d) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
CSOCLC also asked for an order invalidating the candidature Buhari, in respect of the election to the office of president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria at the 2019 General Elections.
The plaintiff counsel Nnamdi Nwokocha-Ahaaiwe, said that as at press time none of the defendants has filed a defence to the suit.
A 14-paragraph affidavit deposed to by Mr ThankGod Unanimously who claimed he was a programme officer at the plaintiff’’s office was attached to the originating summons.
He averred that “The 3rd Defendant in the Affidavit of Personal Particulars (Form INEC Form C.F. 001) which he submitted to the 1st Defendant failed to include any evidence or proof of any qualification at all which he claims to possess.
“Since no document which can be considered proof of academic qualification was attached to the said Affidavit in Proof of Personal Particulars, the 3rd Defendant is ex facie, not qualified to stand for the election.”